Note: Not all items in the Bibliography are required readings. For each topic, required readings will be selected from the Bibliography as listed in the Schedule; however, additional readings may be selected during the semester. Thus, this should be considered a general and historic bibliography that may be useful not only for this course but also, among others, for preparation for the qualifying exam.

Organization: Bibliography is organized by topics as listed and described in more detail in the section Outline of Topics in course syllabus.

Finding full text for items in the bibliography: journal articles can be obtained from Rutgers University Library (RUL) collection of electronic and print journals; all other items are either on RUL class reserve for the course or a URL is given.

Baum, C. D. (1992). Feminist Thought in American Librarianship. McFarland, 1-26.

Castels, M. (1989). The Informational City: Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process. Cambridge:Basil Blackwell, 172-228.

Dain, P. (1975). Ambivalence and Paradox. Library Journal, 94, 261-266.

Ettma, J. (1984). Three Phases in the Creation of Information Inequalities. Journal of Broadcasting 28, (4), 383-95.

Fabure, L. and Martin, H.A. (1976). Book as a Force for Change. In The Coming of the Book N.L.B., 248-332.

Harris, M. (1973). The Purpose of the American Public Library. Library Journal, 92, 2509-14.

Kozmetsky, G. (1991). The Contemorary Information Economy. In Critical Issues in the Information Age. Edited by Chartrand, R.L. , Scarecrow Press, 43-69.

Mills, John Stuart. (1921). On Liberty. Atlantic Monthly Press, 59-111. [On reserve]

Radford, G. (1992). Positivism, Foucalt and the Fantasia of the Library: Conceptions of Knowledge and the Modern Library Experience. Library Quarterly, 62, (4), 408-424.

Shera, J. H. (1970). Sociological Foundations of Librarianship. Washington, D.C.: ASIS Publishing, 52-110. [On reserve]

Shera, J. H. and Egan, M.E. (1953). A review of the present state of librarianship and documentatio. In:Bradford, S.C. Documnentation. 2nd ed. London: Crosby pp. 11-45. [On reserve]

Abbott, Andrew. (1988). The System of Professions. University of Chicago Press, Chapters 1, 8, and 11.

Boyd, R. W. (1996). The History and Historiography of Information Science; Some Reflections. Information Processing & Management, 32 (1), 3-17.

Buckland, M. K. (1992). Emanuel Goldberg, electronic document retrieval, and Vannevar Bush's Memex. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (4), 284-294.

Burke, Colin. (1992). The other Memex: The tangled career of Vannevar Bush's information machine, The Rapid Selector. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43 (),648-657.

Bush, V. (1945). As We May Think. Atlantic Monthly, 176, (11), 101-108. Available: http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/computer/bushf.htm

Curley, A. (1976). Social Responsibility and Libraries, Advances in Librarianship (4), 77-90 and 97-101.

Gorn, S. (1983). Informatics: Its Ideology, Methodology, Sociology, In: The Study of Information: Interdisciplinary Messages, Editors Machlup, F and Mansfield, U. NY: Wiley, 121-140.

Harris, R. (1992). The Erosion of a Woman’s Profession. NY: Ablex, Chapter 1, 2, and 7.

Himmelfarb, G. (1997). Revolution in the Library. American Scholar , 197-204.

Richards, P. (1994). The Internationalization of Science and Scientific Information in the Twentieth Century. In Scientific Information in Wartime:The Allied German Rivalry 1939-1945. Greenwood, 1-22.

Salton, G. (1987). Historical Note: The Past Thirty Years in Information Retrieval, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39 (5), 375-380.

Saracevic, T. (1999). Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (9) 1051-1063

Shera, J.H. and Cleveland D. (1977). The History and Foundation of Information Science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 12, 250-275.

Swanson, D. (1988). Historical Note: Information Retrieval and the Future of an Illusion, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, (2), 92-98.

Vakkari, P. (1994). Library and Information Science: Its Content and Scope. In I.P. Godden, Editor, Advances in Librarianship, San Diego: Academic Press.

Buckland, M. (1991). Information and Information Systems. New York: Preaeger, Chapters 1,4, 5, & 6.

Brookes, B.C. (1973). Numerical Methods of Bibliographic Analysis. Library Trends, 19-43.

Brookes, B.C. (1980). The foundations of information science: Part I. Philosophical aspects. Journal of Information Science, 2, 125-134.

Cornelius, I. (2002). Theorizing information for information science. Annual review of Information Science and Technology, 36. Medford, NJ Information Today, Chapter 9, 393-425.

Crane, D. (1967). The Gatekeepers of Science: Some Factors Affecting the Selection of Articles for Scientific Journals. The American Sociologist, 11 , 488-501.

Fairthome, R. (1967). Morphology of Information Flow. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 14, (4), 33-39.

Harsanyi, M. (1993). Multiple Authors, Multiple Problems-Bibliometrics and the Study of Scholarly Collaboration. Library and Information Science Research, 15 (4), 325-354.

King, J. (1987). A Review of Bibliometric and Other Science Indicators and Their Role in Research Evaluation. Journal of Information Science, 13 , 261-276.

Machlup, F. and Mansfield, U. (1983). Cultural Diversity in Studies of Information. In F. Machlup and U. Mansfield, Editors, The Study of Information. Wiley, 3-59.

Metoyer-D, C. (1993). Gatekeepers In Ethnolonguistic Communities. Ablex, Chapter 8.

Price, D. The Revolution in Mapping of Science: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science Meeting 16, 249-253.

Small, H. (1986). The Synthesis of Specialty Narratives from Co-citation Clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, (3), 97:110.

Wersig, G.and Neveling, U. (1975). The Phenomena of Interest to Information Science. The Information Scientist, 9, (4), 127-140.

White, H. and Mc Cain, K. (1998). Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-citation Analysis of Information Science 1972-1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49 (4), 327-355.

Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N. & Brooks, H. (1982). ASK for Information retrieval Part I. Journal of Documentation, 38 (2), 61-72.

Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N. & Brooks, H. (1982). ASK for Information retrieval Part II. Journal of Documentation, 38 (3), 145-164.

Belkin, N.J.. (1984). Cognitive Models and Information Transfer. Social Science Information Studies , (4), 111-129.

Borgman, C. (1989). All Users of Information Retrieval Systems are not Created Equal: An Exploration Into Individual Differences. Information Processing and Management 25 (3), 237-251.

Dervin, B., and Nilan, M. (1986). Information Needs and Uses. In M.E. Williams, Editor, Annual Review of Information cience and Technology, 21, 3-33.

Ellis, D. (1992). The Physical and Cognitive Paradigms in Information Retrieval Research. Journal of Documentation, 48 (1), 45-64.

Kuhlthau, Carol. (1993). A Principle of Uncertainty for Information Seeking. Journal of Documentation, 44, (12), 339-355.

Kuhlthau, Carol. (1993). Seeking Meaning:A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Ablex,xvii-53.

McKechnie, E.F., Goodall, G.R., Lajoie-Paquette, D. and Julien, H. (2005). "How human information behaviour researchers use each other's work: a basic citation analysis study." Information Research, 10(2) paper 220 [Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/10-2/paper220.html]

Pettigrew, K.E. & McKechnie, L. (2001). The Use of Theory in Information Science Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (1), 62-73.

Todd, R. J. (1999) Back to our beginnings: Information utilization, Bertram Brookes and the fundamental equation of information science. Information Processing & Management 35 (6) 851-870

Wilson, T.D. (2000) Human Informatiion Behavior. Informing Science. 3(2). Available: http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol3/v3n2p49-56.pdf

Choi, Y. & Rasmussen, E. M. (2002). Users'relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history. Information Processing & Management, 38 (5), 695-726.

Cosijn, E. & Ingwersen, P. (2001). Dimensions of relevance. Information Processing & Management, 36 (4), 533-550.

Harter, S. (1992). Psychological Relevance and Information Science. JASIS, 43, (9) 602-615.

Kekalainen, J. & Jarvelin, K. (2002). Using Graded Relevance Assessments in IR Evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (13), 1120-1129.

Park, H. (1997). Relevance of Science Information: Origins and Dimensions of Relevance and their Implications to Information Retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 33, (3), 339-352.

Mizzaro, S. (1997). Relevance: the whole history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 , (9), 810-832.

Saracevic, T. (1975). Relevance: A Review of and a Framework for the Thinking on the Notion in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29 321-343.

Saracevic, T. (1996). Relevance reconsidered. Information science: Integration in perspectives. Proceedings of the Second Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science.Copenhagen (Denmark), 201-218.

Schamber. L., Eisenberg, Miachel, Nilan, Michael. (1990). A Re-Examination of Relevance: Toward a Dynamic, Situational Definition. Information Processing & Management, 26, (6), 775-776.

Vorhees, E. M. (2001). Variations in relevance judgements and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness. Information Processing & Management,

Anderson, J. (1997). Organization of Knowledge In: Feather, J. and Paul Sturges, P. Editors, International Encyclopedia of Information and Library Science. Routledge, 365-353.

Anderson, J. and Perez Carballo, J. (2001). The nature of indexing: how humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval . Part I and II. Information Processing & Management,37 (2), 231-278.

Doyle, L. (1961). Semantic Road Maps for Literature Searchers. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 8, (4), 223-239.

McInerney, C & Day, R. (2002) Special topic section: Knowledge Management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, (12), 1008-1074. Read aricles by McInerney, Blair, Gray.

Shera, J.H. and Egan, M. (1952). Foundations of a theory of Bibliography. Library Quarterly, 22, 125:137.

Molto, M and Svenonius, E. (1991). Automatic Recognition of Title Pages Names. Information Processing & Management, 27, (1), 83-95.

Schamber, L. (1996). What Is a Document? Rethinking the Concept in Uneasy Times? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, (9), 669-671.

Beaulieu, M. and Borgman, C. (1996). A New Era for OPAC Research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47, (7) 491-492.

Belkin, N.J. and Croft, W.B.. (1992). Information Filtering and Information Retrieval: Two Sides of the Same Coin? Communications of the ACM, 35, (12), 29-38.

Belew, R. K. (2000) Finding Out About: A Cognitive Perspective on Search Engine Technology and the WWW. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. Chapter 1; and optional Chaper 7.
Available on G. Muresan web site: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~muresan/IR/Docs/Books/Belew_FOA/

Borgman, C. (1996). Why Are Online Catalogs Still Hard to Use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (7), 493-503.

Croft, W. Bruce. (1995). What Do People Want From Information Retrieval? D-Lib Magazine 1-6.

Hert, C. (1996). User Goals on an Online Public Access Catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (7), 504-518.

Ingerwersen, P. and Willett, P. (1995). An Introduction to Algorithmic and Cognitive Approaches for Information Retrieval. Libri, 45, 160-177.

Ingerwersen, P. and Järvelin, K. (2005). The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Springer. Chapters 1 & 2, 1-54. [on reserve]

Larson, R.R., McDonough, J., O’Leary, P., Kuntz, L. and Moon, R. (1996). Cheshire II: Designing a Next-Generation Online Catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47 (7), 555-567.

Muresan, G. and Harper, D.J. (2004). Topic Modelling for Mediated Access to Very Large Document Collections,Journal of the American Society for Information Science,55 (10): 892 - 910

Salton, G. (1989). Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis, and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley, 229-273.

Salton, G. Allan J. and Buckley, C. (1994). Automatic Structuring and Retrieval of Large Text Files. Communications of the ACM, 37, (2), 97-108.

Sparck Jones, K., Walker, S.,Robertson, S. E. (2000). A probabilistic model of information retrieval: Development and comparative experiments. Part I & Part II. Information Processing & Management, 36 (6)

Spink, Amanda and Losee, Robert. (1996). Feedback in Information Retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 31 , 33-78.

Turtle, H. and Croft, B. (1992). A Comparison of Text Retrieval Models. The Computer Journal, 35, (3), 279-290.

van Rijsbergen, C. (1999) Information Retrieval. ch.1: Introduction. Available on G. Muresan web site: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~muresan/IR/Docs/Books/VanRijsbergen_IR/

Benton Foundation (1997). Buildings, books and bytes: Libraries and communities in the digital age. Library Trends, 46 (1), 178-223.

Bishop, A. and Star, S. (1996). Social Informatics of Digital Library Use and Infrastructure. Williams, M.E. Editor, Annual Review of Information cience and Technology, 31, 301-401.

Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing vision. Information Processing & Management, 35 (3), 9-25.

Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford University Press, 163-198.

Kling, R. (1996). Hopes and Horrors; Technological Utopianism and AntiUtopianism in Narratives of Computerization. In Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Choices. Academic Press, 40-58.

Lesk, M. (1997). Going Digital. Scientific American 276, (3), 58-60.

Marchionini, G.; Plaisant, C.; & Komlodi, A. (in press) The people in digital libraries: Multifaceted approaches to assessing needs and impact. Chapter in Bishop, A. Buttenfield, B. & VanHouse, N. (Eds.) Digital library use: Social practice in design and evaluation. Retrieved Oct. 8, 2002 from: http://ils.unc.edu/~march/revision.pdf

Saracevic, T. (2000). Digital Library Evaluation: Toward Evolution of Concepts. Library Trends, 49, (2) 350-369. Special issue on Evaluation of Digital Libraries.

Zhang, X. & Hui Han (in press). An empirical testing of user stereotypes of information retrieval systems, Information Processing and Management.

D’Elia, G. (1990). Beyond Output Measures.’ In Turock B.J., Editor, Evaluating Federally Funded Library Programs. U.S. Department of Education, 27-38.

Saracevic, T. (1995). Evaluation of Evaluation in Information Retrieval. Proceedings of the 18^th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 137-146.

Saracevic, T. and Kantor, P. (1997). Studying the Value and Information Services. Part I Establishing a Theoretical Framework. Part II Methodology and Taxonomy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (6), 527-542. 543-563.

Tague-Sutcliffe, J. (1992). The Pragmatics of Information Retrieval Experimentation, Revisited. Information Processing and Management, 28, (4), 467-490.

Turock, B. J. (1990). Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation:Eight Models for Assessment. In Evaluating Federally Funded Library Programs. U.S. Department of Education, 67-82.

Turock, B. J. (1991). Assessing Services for Special Populations. In Allen, B. Editor, Evaluation of Public Services. University of Illinois, 125-145.

Van House, N. (1990). Output Measures and the Evaluation Process. In Turock, B.J. Editor, Evaluating Federally Funded Library Programs, U.S. Department of Education, 5-13.

Harman, D. (1995). Overview of the Second Text Retrieval (TREC-2). Information Processing and Management, 31, (3), 271-289.

Harman, D. (1995). The Second Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-2). Information Processing and Management, 31, (3), 269-270.

Ingwersen, Peter. (1982). Search Procedures in the Library-Analyzed from the Cognitive Point of View. Journal of Documentation, 38 , (3), 165-191.

Sparck Jones, K. (1995), Reflections on TREC. Information Processing and Management, 31, (3) 291-314.

Sparck Jones, K. (2000). Further reflections on TREC. Information Processing and Management, 36, (1), 37-85.

Marshall, J.G. (1992). The Impact of Hospital Libraries on Clerical Decision-Making:The Rochester Study. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 80, (2), 169-78.

Salton, G. (1992). The State of Retrieval Systems Evaluation. Information Processing and Management, 28, (4), 441-449.

Saracevic, T., Kantor, Paul, Chamis, Alice and Trivison, Donna. (1988). A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving. 1. Background and Methodology Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39 (3), 161-176.

Saracevic, T. (2004). Evaluation of digital libraries: An overview. Presentation at the DELOS WP7 Workshop on the Evaluation of Digital Libraries, 4-5 October 2004, Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Italy. Available: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~tefko/articles.htm

Tombros, A., Ruthven, I. & Jose, J.M. (2005). How users assess web pages for information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science snd Technology, 56 (4), 327-344.

Voorhees, E. M. and Harman, D. (2000). Overview of the Sixth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC). Information Processing and Management, 36 (1) 3-35.

Association of Library and Information Science Education. (2000). Educating library and information science professionals for a new century - the KALIPER report. URL: http://www.alise.org

Besser, H. (1996). Issues and Challenges for the Distance Education Environment. JASIS, 47, (11), 817-20.

Buckland, M. (1986). Education for Librarianship in the Next Century. Library Trends, 34 777-88.

Coleman, A. (1996). Public Performance and Private Acts. Journal of the Association of Library and Information Science Education, 37, (4), 325-339.

Hannigan, J.. (1994). A Feminist Standpoint for Library and Information Science Education. Journal of the Association of Library and Information Science Education ,, 35. (4), 297-319.

House, N. and Sutton, S. A. (1996). The Panda Syndrome: An Ecology of LIS Education. Journal of the Association of Library and Information Science Education , 37, (2), 131-147.

O’Connor, D. and Mulvaney, P. J. (1996). LIS Faculty Research and the Expectations of the Academic Culture. Journal of the Association of Library and Information Science Education , 37, (4), 306-317.

Reeling, P. and Varlejs, J.. (1993). Editors. Education for the Library Information Profession. Mc Farland, 1-10.

Rober, D. and Connaway, L. (1996). Two Cultures, One Faculty. Journal of the Association for Library and Information Science Education, 37, (2), 120-130.

Shera, Jesse. (1972). The Foundations of Education for Librarianship. Wiley, 81-108.